They are in fact both on the same side… they are both on the side of war.

“Your Daily Dose” is a quick two minute read packed with bite-sized wisdom from all the great teachers. But you could also choose to turn it into something more… a powerful daily practice for personal growth. Give it a try!

A message from today’s meditation:

Today’s journey takes us through our relationships with the people around us, and the world at large.

It has become clear that our “survival self” is primed to “discriminate”. The most primitive part of our brain is hardwired for survival and ready to cast suspicion on anything and anyone that seems different, or “not from our tribe.” 

I grew up in a time during which – in South Africa – the word “discrimination” became the ultimate insult, and was associated with “the bad guys”, the old government and their “evil” worldview.

I really love humans and I am forever a student of how we develop and what makes us do what we do, and I have learned that discrimination is not just what the bad guys do, we are all capable of it. In fact, to discriminate in some way or form, it is probably one of our default settings.

Our “survival self” is primed to discriminate. We have an ancient and inherent need for survival from a time long ago when almost any stranger we’d come across would pose an existential threat.

Any stranger? Yes. 

Anyone from your own tribe would naturally be known to you, and anyone you do not know would therefore be from another tribe. Coming across a stranger would have to set off all of the alarm bells! 

We live in a different world today. If you were to go out to the grocery store today, how many strangers would you encounter? And how many of them would legitimately pose a threat?

Probably none of them but we still carry this same ancient programming, this knee jerk discrimination that divides people into “tribe” and “other” in order to establish our own safe in-group in opposition to the unsafe out-group.

We have this instinct in common with all animals and therefore it’s clear that – while this is at times necessary for survival – this is a part of our “lower nature”.

But then here is how we are different from our animal friends, we have the ability to transcend our lower nature, to see beyond just our own survival and reach for the greater good of all.

I realized that every time I point a finger and create an “Us Vs Them”, I am a part of the problem. I am contributing to the division in the world. This doesn’t necessarily make the trouble in the world any easier to deal with, but it leaves me with one option only and I like it… the only option left to me is, “how do we do this together?” 

We are never going to build a better world while we leave anyone behind. The only way this works is if we are able to open our hearts and also reach the hearts of those who we completely disagree with. 

I’m not trying to say it’s easy, but this is the only option I have left open for myself and I am extremely comfortable with that. 

“We have to create conditions where people feel safe to feel and to care. That goes against a lot of our programming about how to make something change in the world. Sometimes you can pressure people into changing, you can force them, but the powers-that-be have more force than we do. I don’t think we’re going to win in a contest of force. I think we need to induce a change of heart. The narrative of “us versus them” is ultimately part of the problem. Traditional activism, which is about overcoming the latest bad guy, isn’t deep enough. It just brings us another version of the same.”  – Charles Eisenstein

“When both sides of a controversy revel in the defeat and humiliation of the other side, in fact they are on the same side: the side of war.” – Charles Eisenstein 

“Are the problems of the world caused by bad people who need to be crushed? Or do people do bad things when they are in a certain situation? If it is the latter, then we can go around crushing the villains for another thousand years and nothing will change.” – Charles Eisenstein

Mantras for a More Unified World

  • “I choose to see beyond differences and embrace our shared humanity.”
  • “My actions and words will build bridges, not walls.”
  • “Every interaction is an opportunity for connection and understanding.”
  • “Together, we can build a more peaceful and inclusive world.”

By quieting the “us vs. them” chatter and opening our hearts, we pave the way for a future built on unity, not division.  This journey starts with each of us, with every conscious choice to bridge the gap and connect.

May your heart be filled with peace.

– pierre –

Today’s LIVE meditation is: Tonglen.

Today’s LIVE meditation

https://youtu.be/6mbHSy1eDdo 2026

https://youtu.be/9cMGv4rXX-4 2025

https://youtu.be/GKqIs5C66Wg 2024

https://youtu.be/2vLSwKaVNyk 2023

Practice the “Daily Dose”

Let’s put it into practice! Choose what works for you – daily, once a week or whenever inspiration strikes. Putting pen to paper wires the neural pathways that will create your new habits.

1 – Affirmation

Write down your favourite affirmation on a sticky note and place it somewhere that you’ll be able to see it the whole day.

  • “I choose to see beyond differences and embrace our shared humanity.”
  • “My actions and words will build bridges, not walls.”
  • “Every interaction is an opportunity for connection and understanding.”
  • “Together, we can build a more peaceful and inclusive world.”

2 – A moment of reflection

Use today’s question as a journal prompt. If you don’t have the time to sit down and write, just take a moment to reflect on your response.

The Cost of Being Right: Think about a time when you “won” an argument or conflict by defeating or humiliating someone else. How did that victory actually feel afterward? Did it bring you closer to your own higher wisdom? Did it bring the other person closer to their own higher wisdom? What did you gain, and what might you have lost in the process?

3 – Quotes to share

Send a quote to someone who needs it, or share them all on social media to spread the good vibes!

4 – Q&A for deeper learning

Read through the questions and answers and write down at least one “aha moment” that clicked for you.

Q1: Does choosing unity mean I have to accept harmful behavior or abandon my values?

No. Choosing unity doesn’t require you to condone harm or compromise your core values. It means approaching conflict with the recognition that crushing opponents rarely creates lasting change. You can maintain clear boundaries and stand firmly for what you believe while still seeing the humanity in those you oppose. Unity is about changing hearts, not surrendering principles.

Q2: Isn’t discrimination sometimes necessary and appropriate?

There’s an important distinction between healthy discernment and tribal discrimination. Discernment helps us make wise choices about safety, relationships, and values. Tribal discrimination, however, is a knee-jerk reaction that automatically categorizes people as threats based on superficial differences. The key is recognizing when our survival brain is overreacting to perceived threats versus actual dangers.

Q3: How can I work toward unity when others aren’t willing to do the same?

Unity begins with your own choices, regardless of what others do. You can’t control whether someone else opens their heart, but you can control whether you close yours. Often, when one person consistently chooses connection over combat, it creates space for others to soften too. Even when it doesn’t, you maintain your own integrity and contribute to breaking cycles of division rather than perpetuating them.

Q4: What if the “us versus them” divide is based on genuine oppression or injustice?

Recognizing shared humanity doesn’t mean ignoring power imbalances or historical harm. It means understanding that sustainable justice comes from transformation, not just defeating the current “bad guys.” As Eisenstein suggests, crushing villains without addressing underlying conditions simply creates new versions of the same problems. True change requires both accountability and creating conditions where people feel safe enough to change.

Q5: How do I balance self-protection with openness to others?

A: Healthy boundaries and open-heartedness aren’t opposites—they work together. You can protect yourself from actual harm while remaining curious about others’ perspectives. The key is distinguishing between your survival brain’s automatic alarm responses and genuine threats. Practice pausing when you feel defensive and asking, “Am I actually in danger, or am I just uncomfortable?”

Q6: Isn’t traditional activism necessary to create change? Why criticize “overcoming the bad guy”?

A: The critique isn’t about abandoning action—it’s about examining what kind of action creates lasting change. Force-based approaches often breed resentment and resistance, creating endless cycles where we defeat one villain only to face another. Change that comes from touching hearts rather than crushing opponents tends to be more sustainable because it addresses root causes rather than just symptoms.

Q7: What practical steps can I take today to move beyond “us versus them” thinking?

A: Start small: Notice when you feel the urge to categorize someone as “other” and pause. In conversations, practice listening to understand rather than to rebut. Seek out one story or perspective from someone you usually disagree with, approaching it with genuine curiosity. Ask yourself, “What would need to be true about their experience for their position to make sense to them?” These small practices build the muscle of connection over time.